1
PhD Student in Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Sistan and Baluchestan University (corresponding author)
2
Assistant Professor of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Sistan and Baluchestan University (Corresponding Author)
Abstract
The conditional verdict of invalidity in representative Hajj is one of the controversial issues in jurisprudence. Jurists offer different views on the absolution of the obligation of the agent (ajir) to the represented haji (mujir) in the case of invalidity in representative Hajj. Due to the problem and the diversity of the jurisprudential opinions, a careful study is especially necessary. This study represents different views in this field in a descriptive-analytical manner. The findings show that a new perspective can be presented on invalidity in representative Hajj, i.e. in some cases, one can find an invalid representative Hajj as an accepted and sufficient one; but in some others, reject it.
